Questions? You Answer! Game

[rensky]

Originally Posted by jamarquez

A: YES BUT Only if I can get my Chicken for $1.99

Q: How many PHL majors does it take to screw in a lightbulb?

A: i have no damn idea, im a bio major

Q: where else can we eat on campus that's cheaper?

[Keng]

A: Cook yourself

Q: Do you know how rensky? are you 賢慧的女性? haha

[Admin]

A:

Q: Have you read "The Millionaire Next Door" book?

[rensky]

Originally Posted by Keng

A: Cook yourself

Q: Do you know how rensky? are you 賢慧的女性? haha

A: OF COURSE I KNOW! 天天煮飯, 賢良淑得

Q: Do you?

[rensky]

Originally Posted by KayCee

A:

Q: Have you read "The Millionaire Next Door" book?

A: no...

Q: Why ?

[Keng]

Originally Posted by rensky

A: OF COURSE I KNOW! 天天煮飯, 賢良淑得

Q: Do you?

A: Yes I know how to cook and know how to make very good 點心, 蛋糕, 紅豆酥, 蘋果派 等等

A: Kaycee is spooky, isn't he?

[revelationdream]

No, God created the chicken, then it had eggs. His answer is correct.

A: all of them?

Q: Pizza or hamburger?

[Steven]

Originally Posted by revelationdream

No, God created the chicken, then it had eggs. His answer is correct.

A: all of them?

Q: Pizza or hamburger?

Do you have any empirical evidence to support your theory?

[revelationdream]

Do you have any empirical evidence to support yours?

[Steven]

Originally Posted by revelationdream

Do you have any empirical evidence to support yours?

Yes, but you have failed to answer my question.

My theory relies on the validity of evolution. Evolution can be tested in a petri dish. The first step would involve growing a culture of bacteria. One would need to introduce an antibiotic to the culture. This will cause most of the bacteria to die. But a few will have the mutations necessary to survive. They will grow and become dominant.

The first chicken would have evolved in a similar way, but over a longer period of time. A bird similar, but not the same as a chicken existed long ago. As the habitat changed, the bird would have had to adapt through natural selection. Characteristics advantageous to survival would have incrementally become dominant until the bird we now know as a chicken formed.

[rensky]

Originally Posted by Steven

Yes, but you have failed to answer my question.

My theory relies on the validity of evolution. Evolution can be tested in a petri dish. The first step would involve growing a culture of bacteria. One would need to introduce an antibiotic to the culture. This willcause most of the bacteria to die. But a few will have the mutations necessary to survive. They will grow and become dominant.

The first chicken would have evolved in a similar way, but over a longer period of time. A bird similar, but not the same as a chicken existed long ago. As the habitat changed, the bird would have had to adapt through natural selection. Characteristics advantagous to survival would have incrementally become dominant until the bird we now know as a chicken formed.

as a biologist..i totalllllllllllllly agree with steven

[rensky]

Originally Posted by Keng

A: Yes I know how to cook and know how to make very good 點心, 蛋糕, 紅豆酥, 蘋果派 等等

A: Kaycee is spooky, isn't he?

Q: he sure is

A: What kind of 點心 do you know how to make?

[Keng]

Originally Posted by rensky

Q: he sure is

A: What kind of 點心 do you know how to make?

A: I listed it

Q: Are you reading carefully?

[PandaMoOo]

Originally Posted by rensky

as a biologist..i totalllllllllllllly agree with steven

Heh heh... offtopic: Anyone seen Penn and Teller's Bullsh*t series? There is a funny episode about a county educational area voting for "intelligent creation" being taught to high school students as a "possible alternative" to evoluationary theory. Their biology book in fact has a warning label that has it has not been proven to be fact . . . . I wonder if they put the same "not fact" stickers on their bibles? I doubt it Crazy Nuts!

[rensky]

Originally Posted by Keng

A: I listed it

Q: Are you reading carefully?

A: Duh.

Q: Shall we stop debating?

[Steven]

Originally Posted by PandaMoOo

Heh heh... offtopic: Anyone seen Penn and Teller's Bullsh*t series? There is a funny episode about a county educational area voting for "intelligent creation" being taught to high school students as a "possible alternative" to evoluationary theory. Their biology book in fact has a warning label that has it has not been proven to be fact . . . . I wonder if they put the same "not fact" stickers on their bibles? I doubt it Crazy Nuts!

That's pretty funny. I haven't watched that episode. What were the results of the vote?

[revelationdream]

Originally Posted by Steven

Yes, but you have failed to answer my question.

My theory relies on the validity of evolution. Evolution can be tested in a petri dish. The first step would involve growing a culture of bacteria. One would need to introduce an antibiotic to the culture. This will cause most of the bacteria to die. But a few will have the mutations necessary to survive. They will grow and become dominant.

The first chicken would have evolved in a similar way, but over a longer period of time. A bird similar, but not the same as a chicken existed long ago. As the habitat changed, the bird would have had to adapt through natural selection. Characteristics advantageous to survival would have incrementally become dominant until the bird we now know as a chicken formed.

3 scientists met God, and God asked them, "so, you think that you can do as well as I have in creating things?" "Yes, we can. It's called evolution." "Okay, go ahead." "Alright, you start out with some dirt--" God interrupts and says, "Hey... wait, wait, hold up there, guys.... get your own dirt."

birds are birds. it's even more realistic that you can get a chicken from a sparrow, because they're from the same species. it's exactly why we can create so many different dogs by inter-breeding them and messing with their genes, but to even expand on that issue, the dogs we domesticate cannot live out in the wild. they don't have the instincts to know different types of danger, etc. any time you mutate something you lose information, you never gain it.

Inter-breeding is something humans do, but evolotion didn’t create all the species we have. If you get bacteria, you get bacteria. You don't get an animal from bacteria.

[Admin]

as a christian..i totalllllllllllllly agree with revelationdream

Guys, this thread had a purpose in the first place, which was to ask a one liner question and a one liner answer. Don't get me wrong, I love religion and some politics discussion (depending on how much I know) but this thread is not the right place.
Please refrain from continuing the debate/argument and what not.
Back to the simple game shall we?

Originally Posted by rensky

A: Duh.

Q: Shall we stop debating?

A: Yes, we shall.

Q: WHere did you buy your textbooks from?

[rensky]

A: campusi and amazon..seriously i do NOT believe in bronco bookstore. their prices are appalling.

Q: Where d'u guys hang out on campus?

[revelationdream]

A: no where yet really. Yet on monday I'm gonna have a 1 hour and 2 hour break, so probably the student center.

Q: do you work at the school?