Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Keng When Micheal Moore was interviewing in the Senate or House (?) He asked one of the Senator or Represenative (?) that what he think about the family losing their member due to war, that Senator or Represenative (?) said he has niece and family member in Iraq right now. Micheal Moore didn't use that part which prove he's super bias. He created that film solely for the purpose of making Bush lose. |
Yeah, Michael Moore is like that... throws out evidence here and there and gives a rather slanted view. What other documentaries don't? I think there's one coming out ABOUT Michael Moore called "Michael Moore Hates America."
Another example of slanting information, did you know the original report that said second hand smoking was harmful to other's health was heavily slanted, using cherry picked data? Does it mean it's not that valid? Well... that's not for this topic of discussion but... just because someone is biased doesn't mean you can dismiss their idea and logic as false.
In fact you SHOULD be listening to the other side to see if there's something you're wrong about. I check bush's site every week to see if he has any new revelations, just the same old spin about jobs most of the time. But sometimes not something new and beats Kerry's ideas... I'd probably be mostly republican and traditional if republicans were not full of so much corruption.