View Single Post
Old 10-05-04, 09:09 PM   #125 (permalink)
jamarquez
Active Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Covina
Posts: 129
jamarquez is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven
A: You have not said much about 68. You seem to keep talking about 1A. Let us ignore that one for now.

Q: Why is 68 bad in and of itself, asuming state government takes money either way?
OK....

A: Here is why I think 68 is bad.

- More Traffic on the freeways.....
- More Drunks out on the street.....Gambling + drinking = DON't Mix
- Gaming Revenue Act of 2004 (prop 68)has nothing to do with improving public education in California, although it is being promoted as a measure that would help our schools.
- It's just a public safety risk

Q OK or no?
jamarquez is offline   Reply With Quote