[Steven]

Originally Posted by KayCee

Christians believe the bible is the fact of my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called life. It should contain all the teachings of how to become a christian and how you can be saved. Of course, one needs to attend church on Sunday in addition to reading the bible.
zoedragon has a lot of points jot down. I was raised in a christian household most of my my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called life and I wouldn't trade off my faith as a christian with anything else. Christianity is my my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called my one and only so called life.

You have told me what Christians believe is fact, what they need to do to be good Christians, and convince others to follow them. But what I want to know is what empirical evidence do they have for believing in their religion's validity?

Some Christians may have beliefs based on reason rather than faith, but their logic is based on false data. For example, they may say that since the Bible is the truth, God must exists. But their premise is false. There is no empirical evidence to show that the Bible is the truth. They may counter with the fact that God validates the Bible. But their argument would be false again because their premise is false. You would have to find out whether God exists before the argument has any validity. This logical fallacy is called a circular argument.