Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KayCee I wanted to share this with you all, whether it belongs here or not.  |
I have already read something just like what you posted. It involved the same discussion but the people involved were a professor and young Einstein. I think whoever you copied the post from just modified it.
If it is supposed to be a rational argument for belief in God, it is fallacious. The student claims that there is no cold because it is the "absence of heat". That is false. Heat is not a thing. Heat is a way energy is transfered. It is not a form of energy.
His claim that there is no cold because it is the absense of "heat" is also false. If it were true one could just as easily say that there is no "heat" because it is just the absense of nonmoving molecules.
The story is obviously fake because the professor is said to teach that humans evolved from monkeys. That doesn't make sense at all. Humans and monkeys are branches of a common ancestor, but humans did not evolve from monkeys.
As for evolution, we do see it. We see it in the lab, in nature, and in the fossil record.